All The News That’s Fit To- Ahh Who Cares, Just Show Me That Pooping Hippo Again…

This is not a post about pictures of dead babies.

There have been quite enough white men writing articles about dead babies and how courageous it is to show these photographs to as wide an audience as possible…

This is a post about journalism and the internet. Turns out, there’s lot of the former ON the latter, even though many who use the latter seem oblivious to the existence of the former.

Case in point: how many times have I heard or read some variant on the following:

“Wow, that dead Syrian child is really upsetting to look at… Why hasn’t the Western Media been talking about this?!”

Well… the Western media HAS been talking about this.

You just didn’t see it on your Facebook timeline until last week.

Sort of like how there was lots of discussion and analysis of child soldiers before you saw that Kony2012 video.

And ALS existed before you saw people dumping ice water on their heads. Read More

If This Is Your Country, Where Are Your LolCats? (The ‘Digital Native’ Discourse)

This is the space where I tell you that I haven’t updated my blog in a while…

Well, let me keep this short and simple.
I bought a home. I finished my PhD. I got married.

There. We’re all caught up now.

I’ve set myself a goal for the new school year. I intend to post something here each week. Rather than worrying about brilliant insights, I’m going to focus instead on the half-formed thoughts swirling around my head on any given day. So here goes…


I’ve spent the past two days in professional development sessions at one of the unnamed schools where I work. Overall? Really useful.

That said, I found it fascinating that, as a ‘younger’ faculty member (with an interest in media and technology), I was sometimes the lone voice of dissent in the various seminars I attended. (I attended a number of sessions dealing with ‘new media’, because I know that technology is a source of great anxiety for many of my colleagues, and I feel I have something to contribute to many of these conversations.)

I’ll get to some of the other issues raised in these sessions another time. For now, I’m more than a little flabbergasted that in 2015 we’re still using the term ‘Digital Natives’ when we speak about our students. Or about young people in general. Read More

I Frickin’ Love (being deeply ambivalent about) Science

This post is my attempt to sort out various ideas and arguments that have been rattling around my head for the past several weeks. As with so many similar posts, this is not an ATTACK on anyone. In fact, it isn’t even directed at one or two people in particular. (A couple of you may recognize yourself in some of the words below… thank you for helping me re-examine my ideas, and for forcing me to actually sit down and attempt to organize these thoughts into something more coherent than a brief Facebook comment…)

I guess it started when I dared to criticize the Almighty Lord and Saviour, Richard Dawkins.

Or maybe it started earlier, when I found out that I (apparently) HATE Science.

It had definitely started when I was told, in an only somewhat indirect way, that I had contributed to the deaths of MILLIONS OF BABIES in the developing world.

You see, I have opinions on the uses of genetically modified organisms (GMOs). These opinions have lead to some arguments and debates with a handful of individuals in my life, which in turn has introduced me to the exciting world of internet skeptics, rational atheists, pro-GMO pro-vacciners (apparently you’re required by law to view the two through the same lens), and others who Fucking Love Science. Read More

Citation Needed

I finally got around to starting danah boyd’s new book, “It’s Complicated: The Social Lives of Networked Teens”.
For those who don’t know danah (yes, the ‘d’ is deliberately lower-case. Just go with it), she’s a fantastic researcher who works with Harvard, Microsoft, NYU, and others. Unlike most people who write about ‘young people and the internet’, danah actually does RESEARCH. Yeah. I know. Crazy, right? I mean, all it takes to call yourself a ‘social media expert’ these days is a goddam twitter account (and/or amazing hair: see AOL’s ‘Shingy’…) So why bother doing ethnographic work for years, interviewing teens and reading relevant literature… that’s for suckers.

I like danah’s work. She’s connected to a group of researchers that has interested me for years – the DML (Digital Media and Learning) hub.

After years of working in the area of media literacy, I’m pretty tired of seeing media researchers with zero interest in education, and education researchers who don’t give a damn about media. Both groups will enthusiastically publish papers and books on media literacy, of course. But who can be bothered to learn the terrain in more than one field?

That’s why the DML folks have intrigued me. They seem to have one foot in each field, and their focus is on LEARNING, rather than just on teaching/instruction.

So I had very high hopes for danah’s book. And I do like it. It’s a really important read for many, many audiences. If you’re a parent, and you worry about young people using the internet, please read this book. It’s thorough, well-researched, and enjoyable to read.

If you’re an academic working in education or communication, please read this book. It’s a rare example of research with actual purpose (no offense to those of you working in academia, but seriously… how many books/papers do you read each year that really don’t matter in the slightest?) In this book, danah wants to help adults understand how young people actually USE social media, so that we can actually develop policy/curriculum/practice based on reality, rather than fear, prejudice, or ignorance.

All of that said, I do want to share a minor quibble I have with the book, which is really just a way to discuss a bigger pet peeve I have from my own dissertation work.

Over the past few years, I have encountered too many academic papers and books (with danah’s book being one of them) with citations/references that drive me nuts.

Let me be really clear here. I teach first-year students about academic research. That’s my job. I do it 3 semesters a year, 500+ students a year. I teach them how and why we cite our sources.

Moreover, I take citations seriously in my own work. The idea that one of the citations in my dissertation might be incorrect keeps me awake at night. Literally. I have literally stared at the ceiling at 4 in the morning worrying that my committee will come across a single incorrect citation and decide that maybe grad school was never truly ‘for me’…

So when I read an academic essay or book in my own research, and I come across a mistake (in a published work…) it drives me insane. How did this make it into print? Did someone not notice, or did someone not care? How come you get to have an illustrious career and still be so shitty at this simple thing? (I’m looking at YOU, Chomsky…)

A few months ago, I found an indirect quote I really liked. I wanted to read the original work, to get a bit more context and understanding. The source I had available to me didn’t even include the volume/issue of the original journal article. Thanks for that, asshole. Fine. I’ll look it up. Ok. Got the volume number, got the issue number. The article was on pages 1 through 16 of that issue.

So why the hell are you quoting this passage and saying it was on page 18?

Really. I know typos happen. They happen all the time. They are in this blog post, I’m sure.

But little details like this matter. If I can’t find your sources, I can’t verify your facts. That’s kind of how this system works.

In the opening chapter of danah’s new book, there’s a rather oblique reference to the fact that Socrates once mentioned a king who didn’t like writing.

Ok. I’m going to stop you right there.

I’ve worked in media literacy long enough to recognize a Neil Postman reference when I see one.

Sometimes it seems like everyone who works in this field has read Neil Postman, and far too many people actually like him.

The title of his biggest book was ‘Amusing Ourselves to Death’. That’s his attitude towards modern media. We are using them to Amuse Ourselves… to DEATH.

Postman spoke and wrote in breathless hyperbole. We was the quintessential old man yelling at the teenagers on his front lawn.

But he’s popular. His crappy books are on countless reading lists in communication and media studies courses. I get it.

Postman famously quotes Plato’s Phaedrus, in which King Thamus worries that the new invention of writing will make men more forgetful.

I teach this stupid reading every semester.

So I read a vague reference to Socrates and writing, and I think to myself, “another Postman reader. Oh well.” I flip to the notes at the back of the book to confirm my suspicion, and what do I see?

Not a Postman citation.

Not even Plato.

Nope. I see a link to a faculty member’s course website at the University of Illinois.

Now I’m really not trying to criticize danah boyd specifically here. It’s a great book. Go read it. She does fantastic research.

What upsets me is that this is standard operating procedure in academia.

You’re citing Plato. My assumption is that you’re doing so by way of Postman.

And all we get in the notes? A link to a PDF on someone’s course website.

(Side note: for anyone who works in and around universities, answer me this: How often does your university re-build the entirety of its web infrastructure? I’m guessing this link is broken within 24 months, tops.)

If you work in education, you should know how to cite.

If you publish academic work, or if you work for a publisher, you should really know how this stuff works.

Take the extra 5 minutes. Find the book. Double-check your citation. Then you can sleep soundly at night.

Haters Gonna Hate: Thoughts on Lanier’s “Who Owns The Future?”

Jaron Lanier’s new book came out last week, and if the reviews online are any indication, I may be the only person on the planet who actually READ the damn thing from cover to cover.

The Globe and Mail reviewer certainly didn’t.  Slate, Salonacademic blogs… you name it. It’s extremely easy to write a review if you only skim the first few pages. Reading is hard. Read More

Seth MacFarlane, The Onion, and the fine art of Mansplaining.

Yes, yes… it’s been a veeery long time since I’ve posted anything here.

Well, instead of simply writing about WHY I haven’t posted (major health issues, holidays, and an insane teaching load this semester), I’ll just dive right into the post-Oscar media frenzy. Read More

Shameless Hustle: Scenes Research CFP

Thought I’d share this here, as it’s something I’ve been involved with for a little while now…

For those interested in ‘scene’ as a research tool:


Call for Papers

Scene Again: Social Life, Research, and Cultural Studies – Special Issue intended for Cultural Studies Read More

More Eastern Book Learnin’: What I Actually DO for a Living

Two posts in one day? Has he gone mad?

Here is a second paper that I presented in Kitchener-Waterloo last week. This one summarizes three empirical case studies and the methodological strands connecting them. I co-authored this paper with two colleagues, and I would encourage you to check out their work when you can.

Hopefully, there will be more work from this ongoing collaboration to post soon.

(Note: these are edited/modified versions of the papers presented at Congress 2012 in Kitchener-Waterloo. For full versions with reference lists, please feel free to contact me. Some content has been reserved for future publications.) Read More

Weather’s Good There in the Fall: On Alberta’s Near-Miss with the WRP

“Now the Irish have a saying, and in it truth will always ring… / 

Don’t matter who you vote for, you always end up with a king.”

          – The Rheostatics, ‘Bread, Meat, Peas & Rice’.


After an evening of (mild) relief and (even milder) surprise, I have a few comments on the Alberta provincial election.

For those who may not know my terrible secret… I’m an Albertan. I know… Me. Albertan. And here you thought I was so well behaved and hygienic.

Nope. I grew up in Calgary, and I still visit my parents each year at Christmas. I like to think I have some insight into the world of Albertan politics, having experienced The Crazy firsthand. So with that in mind, here are my thoughts on yet another Conservative majority… Read More

Living in the Future, Part 1

I’ll be the first to admit – when the iPad was first released, I made my fair share of jokes. Why on earth would I want an over-sized iPhone? Why would I want a laptop with no keyboard, no USB ports, and a hefty price tag?

And here I am… composing a blog post on a goddam iPad.

How did it come to this?

Well, I guess it started when my MacBook decided it no longer had a wireless card, a Bluetooth card, or even a power supply. A laptop is pretty useless when it won’t connect to … anything… and it flat-out dies after a few hours of use, never to work again.  Read More